Business 350
Auto Express Photographs Volkswagen T-Roc eTSI 150 Style in Long-Term Test
In this issue
Business 350
Auto Express Photographs Volkswagen T-Roc eTSI 150 Style in Long-Term Test
Culture 378
Used 1983 Porsche 911SC Targa listed with disputed mileage history
Economy 51
British healthcare worker tests positive for Ebola in Congo
News 166
Florida Dealer Lists 2012 Audi A5 Cabriolet Without Reserve Price
Politics 125
Musk’s reported $474 million political ad spend contrasted with alternative car p…
Sports 301
Owner Lists Modified 1987 Porsche 928 S4 for Sale in Virginia
Technology 361
Electric cars wear tyres faster than petrol models, MOT data shows
Prince Harry and six other claimants have lodged an appeal against a summer ruling in their privacy case against Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail.
By George Kensington · 2 min read
Prince Harry and six other claimants have filed an appeal against a privacy ruling that went against them earlier this year, in a long-running legal dispute with Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail. The appeal was lodged in early November 2026, and the claimants now face the possibility of having to pay millions in costs if the original decision stands.
The case centres on allegations that the publisher unlawfully gathered information about the claimants. Several well-known figures joined the action alongside the Duke of Sussex, and the group pursued the claim together after the matter was brought before the courts. The original ruling, handed down during the summer, went against the claimants, and the appeal is their attempt to overturn it.
Harry's legal team has publicly confirmed that the appeal has been filed, with the BBC and Sky News both reporting the move. The Telegraph has also reported that the wider case touches on phone hacking allegations, a subject that has dogged the British newspaper industry for many years and that has been the focus of successive legal and regulatory battles.
The available reports do not set out the exact grounds on which the appeal is being brought, and no date has yet been confirmed for any appeal hearing. The outcome therefore remains uncertain. For the claimants, the stakes extend beyond the financial exposure: a successful appeal would revive arguments about how far newspapers may go in obtaining private information, while a failed one would leave the earlier ruling in place and the cost burden intact.
8